Wednesday, August 16, 2017

President Donald Trump is Not a Racist


First let me say, David Duke's support of President Trump is no less an indictment on the president being a racist than Grand Dragon Sen. Robert Byrd's mentoring of Hillary Clinton makes her a racist.


Over this past weekend, the president made two statements both condemning the violence produced by hatred and bigotry on display in Charlottesville, VA. He repeated his past condemnation of David Duke and the KKK previously made during the presidential campaign. His position is clear on the issue.

The white supremacist group stood to protest the removal of the statue of General Robert E. Lee. Others came to stand for the removal of the statue. Heather Heyer stood in the crowd to support removing the statue. What followed was a confrontation and the death of three people, including Heyer and two state police officers. Heyer was run over by a car driven by white supremacist James Fields, Jr. from Ohio. The act of the lone driver plowing into a sea of lawful protesters is abhorrent and tragic. We all agree.


On Tuesday, August 15, 2017, the president took his statements even further by calling both sides of the event (Alt-Left and Alt-Right) to blame for the violence. Based on the media coverage available showing the usual suspects with black masks on faces (Alt-Left) and white robes (Alt-Right including the KKK), the president was accurate in his statements and he provoked a query of us all - how far the Alt-Left will go with tearing down the physical reminders of racism. Will the statues of President Washington and Thomas Jefferson be next,? he asked. Where is the line in responding to racism by tearing down the evidence of the past? In this query, the president doesn't condone or ignore the hatred that divides, but rather highlights the irrational response to racism promoted by the Alt-Left.


Moreover, what has been lost in the national discourse is the president's call for unity and peace. The Alt-Left media would rather distract the nation by what the president said and what he did not say. This is not what we need. This is an intentional agenda, promoted by the Alt-Left media and the Alt-Left itself to divide us around identity politics. After all, the KKK, along with David Duke, are of no real consequence. Surely it is no surprise that hate is among us.


The time to divide must pass. The time to push a political agenda to unseat a president you may not like must pass.


The violence promoted by groups like BLM who not so long ago decried pigs in a blanket fry em like bacon (a slogan that preceded the slaughter of police officers in NY and Dallas), and the organized efforts by the likes of financier George Soros and MoveOn.org and countless other Alt-Left nonprofits to sow seeds of hate that divide and kill must also stop.


All violence must continue to be condemned from all sides of the political spectrum; the harsh reality is that the expression of ones hatred is not illegal.


Notwithstanding the need for leadership to be united standing against violent expression of hate, now is a time for peace which may only come about by prayer.


Lets pray.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

#NeverHillary

I just returned from an unprecedented gathering of faith leaders with the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald Trump, in New York. My friends ask me, how can I consider voting for Donald Trump? They fail to realize that Hillary Rodham Clinton's (HRC) very clear record of failure makes my choice for president in this election cycle easier.

We all know the kind of United States Supreme Court HRC will give us if she has the opportunity to appoint vacancies. It will be a Leftist activist judiciary making up laws (not interpreting the Constitution as is its job.). Constitutional Conservatives cannot risk that. Religious Liberty and the Second Amendment hang in the balance with the current imbalance on the court. Both have been under attack by the Left since the early 60’s with prayer and the Ten Commandments excised from the public square and ever more encroaching gun control laws.

The faith community has fought for faith-based organizations’ right not to include abortifacients in their health insurance plans as just one example of the fight for religious freedom. Liberals simply don't respect the right to practice one's religious beliefs on the abortion issue if those beliefs conflict with their agenda to murder the unborn whenever the mother, in particular, finds it convenient.

Similarly, the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment is just one Liberal president away from being a distant memory. With every radical jihadist terror attack, the Left attacks gun ownership instead of the real issue – the war against the radical elements of Islam.  It's shameful.

The facts around the world show that disarming the citizenry makes us less safe because the criminals keep their weapons and leave everyone else more vulnerable. Criminals, or those with a diminished mental capacity, will not adhere to gun control laws. That's the nature of a criminal or the mentally insane. That's just how it works! Liberals trip over themselves to be seen “doing the right thing” even if the “right thing” has been proven not to work.

“Why does Switzerland, a country that requires a military-style rifle, plus ammunition, in every home, enjoy a very low homicide rate? Why does Israel, a country where perhaps 10 percent of citizens possess permits to carry concealed weapons, enjoy a very low murder rate? Why do gun-control proponents fail to mention countries with homicide rates higher than ours, including Brazil and Russia, with very restrictive gun-control laws? Why does Washington, D.C., a district whose laws make it illegal to buy, possess, transport or acquire a handgun, experience the highest per capita murder rates in the nation?” asked national radio and television commentator Larry ‘Elder writing for Town Hall.

Our freedom is at stake and the Supreme Court is the only institution that can preserve it. With Justice Scalia dead, Justice Ginsberg on the verge of her last breath, Justice Kennedy approaching 80 years old, and Justice Thomas considering retirement, the next president could impanel as many as an unprecedented four, if not five, U.S. Supreme Court Justices. This election is about the U.S. Supreme Court.

We also know HRC's foreign policy record is one of utter failure. Russia & Libya are only a few worth mentioning here.

Under former president Bill Clinton in 1994, we promised to stand and protect Ukraine from Russia if they got rid of their nukes. They did. Then the Obama Administration stood by and watched Russia invade Ukraine and annex Crimea because they could not defend themselves. So much for HRC’s 2009 reset button with Russia. Russia fully annexed Crimea in 2014 just after HRC’s departure from the State Department. With resets like that, who needs a secretary of state or president like HRC?

In Benghazi, Libya, U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens cried out to Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department for help and protection on multiple occasions. HRC and her State Department ignored Ambassador Steven’s cries for help. The ambassador and three other men of valor (Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty) are now dead. Ten others were injured. HRC authored and perpetuated a lie and dished it out to the victim’s families that the attack was a spontaneous response to an anti-Islam video while telling her own daughter Chelsea the truth on the night it happened that it indeed was terrorism. The video as a cause for the attack was a complete fabrication crafted to fit Obama’s appeasement of radical Islam, in my opinion. No one, especially HRC, has paid for this gross inability to protect Americans and then lying about it. HRC is unfit for the presidency on this point alone.  Imagine a Republican committing these shameful misdeeds.

Now Obama, and by extension HRC, strain to allow 85,000 Syrian refugees into the U.S. whom they cannot properly screen. We know these radical jihadists infiltrated the humanitarian migration effort to settle Syrian refugees into Europe. While the November 2015 attackers in Paris were EU citizens, they fought in Syria and migrated back into Europe. This infiltration led to the slaughter of 130 people on November 13, 2015 in Paris. How can we support this type of ideological blindness that bends over backwards to be politically correct on the world stage while putting Americans in harm’s way?

Finally, HRC believes she is above the law. Beyond her repeated lies (like her husband who was impeached for perjury) that any wrong doing was done with respect to her email server, the report from the State Department itself is clear. She violated her own agency's policies and was criticized sharply by the inspector general. The "jury" is still out as to whether HRC negligently handled thousands of emails marked as classified (some so top secret that the Inspector General could not even read them); this would be a crime. Lets not forget she deleted over 30,000 emails.  Wonder why?  This matter is still under investigation and will certainly plague HRC well into the General Election. Does any Liberal or Democrat care? Anyone else with State Department emails intentionally placed off the grid on a private server and jeopardizing national security would have been indicted and recommended for criminal prosecution. Do Americans want another president who does not respect the rule of law?

I think conservatives know what the clear choice is for our national security and our values; Trump is no easy choice for a conservative or for me but a NO vote for HRC is a no-brainier. Now let’s see if "The Donald" can persuade me along with other conservative voters to cast our lot with him. Today's meeting in the Big Apple was a good start.   #NeverHillary


Friday, September 25, 2015

Do as I Say; Not as I Do

Pope Francis, arguably the most credible figure of hope alive in the world today, descended upon America this week making a splash for the ages. It was truly historical but not without controversy. His remarks were both religious and politically partisan.


“Pope Francis challenged America Thursday to embrace millions of undocumented immigrants and join a global campaign against climate change and poverty, wading undaunted into the nation's volatile politics in a historic address to Congress,” reported CNN.  Notwithstanding the Pope’s recent encyclical on the environment which is political and controversial for which I strongly disagree, I find his comments on immigration more troubling.


“Thousands of persons are led to travel north in search of a better life for themselves and for their loved ones, in search of greater opportunities. Is this not what we want for our own children?” he said. “We need to avoid a common temptation nowadays: to discard whatever proves troublesome. Let us remember the Golden Rule: ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,’” he added.


However, the pope is not only the head of the Catholic Church but also the head of state of Vatican City which has the most restrictive citizenship and immigration policy in the world. It has NO legal or illegal immigrants because immigration is not allowed. In fact, women are allowed as residents of the Vatican only by virtue of their marital status to one who resides there. Comprising 108.7 acres and 1,000 full-time residents only half of whom are citizens, the Vatican, often acting as a corporation called the Holy See, is a fortress in the heart of Rome.


While the Catholic Church preaches placing the needs of the illegal immigrant over the needs of the state-the United States to be specific, unfortunately, that sermon does not seem to apply to the Vatican. On that basis, I cannot help but ask how much credibility can the pope have on this issue? I recognize the enormous good Catholic Charities does around the world and so my observation does not intend to diminish the good and power of the Catholic Church to be a force for good in the world. However, Pope Francis’ application of the Golden Rule to “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” rings hollow when the Vatican simply will not do what it demands of the United States.


Just as the Vatican must preserve its resources for those who reside within its borders, so too must the United States, the largest recipient of immigrants in the world, preserve its sovereignty and resources by controlling the influx the immigration through a legal process. That’s not asking too much of the greatest nation on earth built on legal immigration.

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Carson Is Right

The question whether Ben Carson is fit to be president of the United States after giving his opinion about the viability of a Muslim president seem to be fair only when one suspends any recollection of a media that never cared that President Obama attended Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church where racist and anti-American rhetoric was commonplace. So let’s pretend this is a sincere question asked by an unbiased journalist.


Ben Carson, responding to a question from Meet the Press host Chuck Todd about whether or not a Muslim could be considered as president of the United States, Carson responded, “I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that," The media excoriated him for that statement labeling him a bigot. Carson went on to say, "I guess it depends on what that faith is," he said. "If it's inconsistent with the values and principles of America, then of course it should matter. But if it fits within the realm of America and consistent with the Constitution, no problem." While I would have made clear there is no religious test under the Constitution first and foremost, I agree with Carson’s statement because of the implications and potential of the spread of sharia law, a parallel system of laws, under a Muslim president. (Carson later made it clear on FoxNews' Sean Hannity Show he was referring to a radical Islamist.)


It is widely believed in the Islamic world that sharia law is the revealed word of God. Islamic States vary on how sharia law should be applied and whether it extends to non-Muslims but in all cases, under sharia law, women are second class citizens (e.g. cannot vote, cannot drive, and are stoned to death for adultery), homosexuality is punished by death, and a host of other policies inconsistent with American freedom exist under sharia. In any event, a devout Muslim would have to reject sharia law in order to be president. It should also be noted that sharia law is moving across non-Arab nations like England, Germany, France, and Belgium in substantial ways. These European nations have Sharia Law Zones where the Koranic Law controls entire communities. The desire for Islam to spread sharia law around the world is real and present.


On that basis, presidential candidate Ben Carson’s opinion was absolutely correct and he should not capitulate to any special interest, let alone CAIR (widely understood to be a front for the terrorist group Hamas), and offer any apology at all.


The media, on the other hand, is consistently unreliable and biased. They focus on Carson’s opinion while ignoring the worse presidency in American history along with behavior that disqualifies President Obama for his office. He is not disqualified solely because he has made the United States the largest financier of terrorism with his deal with Iran; he is not disqualified solely because he has silently allowed the genocide, rape and beheading of Christians in Iraq while rescuing Syrian refugees; he is not disqualified solely because he consistently lied to the American people about life-altering legislation and policy (e.g. ObamaCare); nor is he disqualified solely because he refuses to protect the unborn or infants born alive by standing with Planned Parenthood no matter what. President Obama is disqualified as president because he violated his vow to uphold the Constitution.


Whether its Obama’s countless revisions to the Affordable Care Act without Congress, his recess appointments found by the Supreme Court to be an overreach of his authority, his administration’s (IRS) political profiling of conservative groups, his attacks on religious freedom (of Christians), or his executive orders amending immigration law without Congress, Forbes chronicled Obama’s lawlessness and it is pervasive.


While the president’s spokesman demands the Republican presidential candidates repudiate Carson’s remarks about a Muslim president and apparently endorses the opposite view, they might stop and think for a moment. If the United States ever had a Muslim president who practices sharia, all of the LGBT domestic and foreign policies, including same-sex marriage, pushed by this White House would be wiped away in an instant. Instead, the White House, with the Main Stream Media’s help, is more interested in scoring political points against a very smart and decent man whose traditional values and success story are “the stuff” our nation needs in a president.

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Shame on the Smithsonian

The Smithsonian Institute refuses to remove a bust of eugenicist and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger from its “Struggle for Justice” exhibit from the National Portrait Gallery despite the demand from Ministers Taking a Stand (“MTS”), a group of black pastors led by Bishop E. W. Jackson.  While acknowledging Sanger’s involvement in the eugenics movement, in a letter to MTS, Director Kim Sajet responded, “There is no ‘moral test’ for people to be accepted into the National Portrait Gallery.” While allowing Sanger’s bust to remain alongside Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr., Sajet said, “[Sanger’s] association with the eugenics movement shadowed her achievements in sex education and contraception…”

The Smithsonian’s response to MTS is offensive to anyone who understands the history of eugenics and Planned Parenthood and comparable to the symbolic requests to remove the Confederate flag in South Carolina after the horrific mass murder in Charleston.  By refusing to place the memory of Sanger in its proper place alongside Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Josef Mengale, the Smithsonian celebrates the founder of race suicide.

The following is an excerpt from my book The Prodigal Republican which provides an historical perspective on Sanger to underscore the Smithsonian’s naïveté: 

“Before the Roe v. Wade decision was handed down in 1973, white women were responsible for having 80 percent of all illegal abortions.

Since Roe v. Wade, the abortion rate among black women is five times that of white women in the United States, according to the Guttmacher Institute.  Black women (15-44) are responsible for 40.2% of all abortions in the United States.

But there was a long, dark history before Roe v. Wade that led to the genocide in the black community we see today. The efforts of the American Eugenics Society… began right after the Emancipation Proclamation took effect….

Every aspect of the American economy was invested in the slave trade, so first and foremost, there was a general fear of retribution by the four million freed slaves. The North feared a massive migration. White elites also feared that freed slaves would flood the economic system with new costs for welfare, medical care, and education… [and they also feared] an increase in crime and the prison population.

The first response was colonization (shipping the Negro back to Africa), but the idea didn’t have wide support. Then [some of] the white and wealthy schemed to wipe out the Negro race in America. Eugenics was the answer.  Eugenics was a movement to shrink the future Negro populations by controlling the birth rate…

Eugenics failed over time but not for lack of trying. The movement imposed sterilization on black people by the thousands… [but ultimately] faced constitutional challenges.

Adolf Hitler mimicked the American eugenics playbook and exterminated Jews. Eventually, eugenics slithered below ground after getting a bad name from Nazi Germany… Reducing the growth of the black population around the world, but especially in America, was still the goal...

Negative eugenics followed. The idea was to create an environment that would convince blacks to limit the number of their children, in effect to accept “race suicide.” This movement was carried out by crusaders like Margaret Sanger, the founder of the American Birth Control League which became Planned Parenthood in 1942 the largest operator of abortion clinics in the United States...

In 1922, Sanger, referring to the Negro, said “we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”  This is the person who occupies space in the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit in the venerable Smithsonian Institute.  How can this be?


Sadly, the Smithsonian only portends to celebrate a pioneer of sex education as it explains in its response to MTS; rather, it misses the point that as a repository of history, the museum fails to recognize Sanger as the monster she was, highlights only her role in contraception while ignoring her intent to annihilate the black community and in so doing offends those of us who are informed. The museum owes the public a duty to tell the truth; it deliberately fails with respect to Margaret Sanger.  Shame on the Smithsonian!

Saturday, August 8, 2015

Obama Repeats the Past: Chamberlain Lives Again



Evil cannot be trusted no matter how clever one thinks of himself.

In September 1938, British Prime Minister (Arthur) Neville Chamberlain signed the Munich Agreement permitting Nazi Germany to annex portions of Czechoslovakia in an act of appeasement to Adolf Hitler to avoid going to war. The agreement was signed by the major European powers of the time: Germany, Great Britain, Italy and France. Neville Chamberlain has gone down in history as one who attempted to appease Hitler who soon thereafter plunged the world into World War II resulting in the Holocaust and the loss of countless lives. The comparative naiveté between Chamberlain and his Munich Pact and the Obama/Kerry Iran Nuclear Agreement cannot be ignored.

After making matters worse in the Middle East by withdrawing U.S. troops out of Iraq and allowing that hard-fought-for territory to fall into the hands of ISIS without a strategy to contain the murderous group, President Obama, either out of shear naiveté or in a deliberate effort to weaken America (as some believe) has doubled down on his failed foreign policy with his Iran Nuclear Agreement.

By presenting a completely false narrative that the two choices are either his Iran deal or war (as did Chamberlain), President Obama, through his half-witted and failed presidential candidate Secretary of State John Kerry, said to the Islamic State we will not stop you militarily and then proceeded to hand Iran all it needs to be the best -financed nuclear threat in the Middle East. In a Neville Chamberlain-like way, Obama naively believes that appeasement will make the world safer. Unfortunately, Neville Chamberlain didn’t have the case study on Hitler at that time that Obama has on Iran today. Like North Korea under Clinton, Iran has lied and cheated their way closer to nuclear capability. He is ignoring history. The murderous regime led by the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is the largest state-sponsor of terrorism in the world. Evil cannot be trusted no matter how clever one thinks of himself.


Notwithstanding the U.N. Security Council’s support, let’s be clear what Obama offers the world with his theoretical (classroom-like) approach to international diplomacy which objectively poses an existential threat to us all:


1. Sanctions against Iran are lifted in advance of any verification of compliance with the agreement allowing them nearly $150 billion. “[I]t gives Iran a "massive infusion of cash," Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu said. "Iran will use this cash to fund its aggression in the region, and its terrorism around the world. As a result of this deal, there will be more terrorism, more attacks, and more people will die," he said.


2. There is no “anywhere anytime inspections” allowed and U.S. inspectors are banned from performing inspections altogether as confirmed by National Security Advisory Susan Rice. Rather, inspections are subject to an onerous notice and review provision with the IAEA which allows plenty of time to cover up any violations.


3. There is no limitation on Iran’s InterContinental Ballistic Missile program which is the mechanism by which nuclear warheads are launched. In fact, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov confirmed Iran is not precluded from receiving weapons from Russia and China by this deal.


4. The deal allows nuclear production after ten years which gives the illusion that we are slowing down nuclear proliferation.


5. Yukiya Amano, head of the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”), confirmed that confidential agreements exist with respect to the IAEA’s inspections of Iran’s nuclear facilities. He said, these agreements cannot be given to the U.S. Congress.


6. Americans are left to rot in Iranian jails after this deal is done.


7. An arms race will begin in the Middle East. “The countries in the region threatened by Iran have already made clear that they will work to develop atomic bombs of their own. The deal that was supposed to end nuclear proliferation will actually trigger nuclear proliferation,” said Netanyahu.


The solution to abate this existential threat? Tighten the sanctions until Iran’s economy cannot breathe; put the option of preventing the Islamic State from acquiring a nuclear bomb through military force back on the table (as suggested by respected Harvard lawyer Alan Dershowitz); demand the release of our four Americans; Iran must agree that Israel has a right to exist; and Iran must stop funding terrorist groups around the world. Reject the nuclear deal; then we can talk from a position of strength!

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

A Moment to Stand Against Pure Evil: Planned Parenthood



Just when we thought the forces of evil could not have a stronger poster child than convicted murderer and abortionist Kermit Gosnell, we learned on July 14, 2015 that the federally-subsidized cornerstone institution of liberalism, Planned Parenthood, is in the business of selling the human remains of aborted children on the black market.  In order to be engaged in this line of business, Planned Parenthood must also be conducting partial-birth abortions which are also illegal. This is a doubly horrific revelation that tax payers are funding.

Planned Parenthood’s senior director of medical services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, was captured on video casually discussing over her lunch how her organization gets around the law that makes such a practice illegal and how there is such a demand for body parts at $30 to $100 per specimen.  She said,


See the undercover video clip recorded by Lila Rose’s non-profit Center for Medical Progress here. Dr. Nucatola, who oversees all abortions for all Planned Parenthood clinics, is very specific in how they go about this illegal practice and how they shield themselves through sub-affiliates in the sale of the body parts. She even has an on-line order form for the body parts the video highlights.

God has allowed us another look into what is happening just around the corner or across the street.  This is our generation’s call to respond to an evil not witnessed in the open since the uncovering of the concentration camps in Hitler’s Germany or even African slavery.  This is our holocaust and we cannot tolerate it or the profiteering associated with it. 

There is no other response to this but the immediate closure of all Planned Parenthood clinics and Congress along with the Department of Justice must force the investigation of all Planned Parenthood participants in this horrific crime and terminate all federal subsidies to this organization - the largest wholesale purveyor of murder in modern history.  How now can we tolerate the harvesting and sale of baby organs for profit?


We can rely on President Obama, the only sitting president to speak at a Planned Parenthood convention, to defend this.  He supports this.  This agenda is the same evil that now attacks crisis pregnancy clinics for not advertising the option of abortion to its patients. Please consider sharing this post, the video attached, and/or write all of your local congressional representatives demanding immediate action against Planned Parenthood.  No matter the ethnicity of the children they are butchering and selling or the communities in which they do it (by the way it is predominantly black babies since this is the largest population served by Planned Parenthood), the admission of this kind of practice out of the mouth of the Dr. Nucatola is irrefutable.  Now let’s do something about it since we know no liberal news will get this word out.  This is your moment to stand against evil.